Hi Phil,

I have some remarks I've enumerated below.  They're just
thoughts that occurred to me as I read the manuscript.

Regards,

Jason

Comments on "Centrifuge Solids/Liquid Separation of Swine
Flushed Manure and Lagoon Sludge"

[1] P. 14, line 7-13, I might word things this way:

"For both flushed manure and lagoon sludge, the six pairwise 
comparisons of mean inputs across treatment combinations 
K,L,CF and LCF were carried out using Tukey's procedure 
to control the experimentwise error rate at p=0.05.  
For the percentage removal of mass across treatments,
input concentration explained a substantial amount of
variability for some parameters, so it was included in
analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) models.  Pairwise 
comparisons among treatment means were made using a
Bonferroni correction to control the experimentwise error 
in these cases."

[2] p. 27, line 17, I think a sentence got chopped off, since
the line ends "...for COD.   were in the order..."

[3] p. 29, lines 35-38, "Adding lime only (L) did not 
significantly affect the amount of removal in any 
parameter.  The CF treatment did significantly increase 
removal to 75% for SS, but not for any TP or TKN.

[4] p. 29, line 40.  There are two periods at the end of
the sentence ending "...CF treatment.".  You might 
consider inserting this kind of sentence at this 
point 
  "This suggests an interaction effect between
  lime and the coagulant/flocculant treatment; the 
  effect of adding both is greater than the sum of 
  the effects of adding each component individually."